For Doctors and Medical Professionals

You won the case.
Why does Google still say you didn't?

Your malpractice lawsuit was dismissed - but it still dominates Google when patients search your name. FamoRenovo publishes a Record of Truth that ranks your vindication alongside the allegations - so patients find the complete picture. The lawsuit does not disappear. The dismissal, finally, appears with it.

84% of patients Google
their doctor first
75% won't book below
a 4-star rating
7+ yrs a lawsuit article
stays in Google

Based on published research into patient online behaviour and our analysis of search landscapes across completed engagements.

Check Your Name Now

What do patients find when they search your name?

Enter your name below. In 30 seconds you will see your actual Google search results, an assessment of the problem, and a simulation of what a Record of Truth would change. No sign-up, no cost, no obligation.

Search Visibility Checker

Enter your name below to see exactly what patients find when they search for you. Takes 30 seconds. Check the Organization box if searching for Hospital or Practice.

Your name runs the Google search and is then discarded - we don't log it, store it, or use it to contact you. Privacy details

Handled with complete discretion

Names live only in your browser, are sent to our search provider for the search alone, then discarded. They are never stored on our systems, never sold, and never used to contact you.

Not stored by us Takes 30 seconds No obligation No account needed to run it

Analysis Results

Grade 4 Strongest case: vindication exists but is buried
Grade 3 FamoRenovo can definitely help
Grade 2 FamoRenovo may be able to help
Grade 1 No immediate action needed
Your information is handled with complete discretion

The names you enter are used only to run the eligibility analysis. They are never stored in a public database, shared with third parties, or referenced in any marketing material. FamoRenovo does not disclose client names or case details - not in publications, not in case studies, not in any external communication. All documentation provided during a commission is treated with the same confidentiality as attorney-client correspondence.

No data sold or shared Takes 30 seconds No obligation No account required
The Problem

Why the lawsuit still shows - and what changes it

A Record of Truth does not erase the allegation. It ensures the outcome ranks alongside it. Anyone searching your name finds both chapters of the story - not only the first one.

Why your dismissal is invisible on Google

When your case was filed, multiple outlets reported simultaneously. Those articles accumulated links, engagement and authority over months and years. When the case was dismissed, the outcome received almost none of that coverage. Court decisions are filed in legal databases, not Google's index. No journalist wrote "Doctor cleared of all allegations."

The result is a permanent asymmetry: the allegation dominates while the vindication is invisible. A malpractice case closed two years ago can look identical to one where the physician lost. Patients who research you see only half the story - and 84% of them do research their doctor before booking.

A Record of Truth fills the gap

FamoRenovo creates a purpose-built vindication publication - assembled from verified court records, dismissal orders and defense verdict documentation - and builds it to rank for the same searches that surface the original allegations.

This is not reputation management. It is not review generation or social media management. A Record of Truth is built to appear for the same searches patients are already running - so that they encounter the complete picture: the allegation and the outcome. It is structured for Google's AI Overview so that conversational search presents the full narrative, not only the first chapter.

Every Record of Truth is built exclusively from verified legal documentation. No claims are made beyond what the evidence supports.

23 days

From publication to position one on Google.

In one engagement, a Record of Truth ranked above malpractice coverage that had been entrenched for years - within 23 days of publication. A surgeon with six articles on page one and zero mention of the dismissal anywhere in Google or AI results now has vindication documentation ranking alongside the original coverage. While timescales vary, this is what is achievable when a defense verdict is properly documented and search-engineered. Case details held on file.

Engagement Case Study - Anonymised
United States Lawsuit dismissed Identity withheld
Before Record of Truth
Search landscape Multiple high-authority articles about the lawsuit ranking on page one. Case outcome absent from all results.
AI Overview Allegation summarised as current fact. Favorable outcome not referenced anywhere in AI-generated responses.
The problem Anyone searching the subject's name encountered only the allegation. The outcome - and the full legal record - was invisible.
Impact Professional reputation, relationships and public standing all exposed to an incomplete and misleading search narrative.
After Record of Truth
Time to rank Record of Truth reached position one on Google within 23 days of publication - above coverage entrenched for years.
Ranking result Vindication documentation now ranks alongside the original lawsuit coverage on page one.
AI Overview Google's AI Overview now references the legal outcome alongside the original allegations - presenting the complete picture.
Documentation Full case record sourced exclusively from verified court documentation and published with the subject's knowledge and approval.

The outcome now ranks alongside the allegation. Anyone searching this subject's name now encounters both the lawsuit and its legal resolution - the complete record, not only the first chapter.

Subject identity and case details withheld in accordance with our confidentiality policy. Full documentation held on file.
The Process

Four steps from case closed to record set straight

Step One

Check your eligibility

Enter your name above. We assess the current search landscape in 30 seconds. You see exactly what patients see and what a Record of Truth would change. No obligation.

Step Two

Commission your Record

Provide case details and legal documentation - court orders, dismissal notices, defense verdict records. Your investment is determined by case complexity and existing negative coverage. 50% deposit to begin.

All documentation handled with strict confidentiality
Step Three

Publication and indexing

We build the Record of Truth from verified sources and deploy it with full search optimisation. You review and approve every element before publication.

Step Four

Monitoring and maintenance

We monitor ranking performance and the broader search landscape, adjusting as needed to maintain and strengthen your Record of Truth over time.

Learn More

Common questions before the eligibility check

Removal almost never works

News articles about malpractice lawsuits are matters of public record. Google will not remove them and publishers are not obligated to take them down, even after a dismissal. Court sealing has no effect on articles already published.

Negative articles entrench over time

Every month those articles stay online, they accumulate more authority in Google's ranking system. The longer you wait, the harder they become to displace. A lawsuit from seven years ago can rank as though it were published yesterday.

AI search makes it worse

Google's AI Overviews and tools like ChatGPT summarise search results into direct answers. If the only content about your name is the allegation, that is what the AI presents to patients as a confident, factual statement.

The answer is not removal. It is completion - creating an authoritative account of the outcome that ranks alongside the coverage that got there first.

A Record of Truth is a structured vindication publication assembled from whatever court papers, dismissal orders and defense verdict records are available for your case. It presents the case accurately - including the nature of the original allegations and precisely what the outcome document says. Nothing is included that the legal evidence does not directly support. The more documentation you can provide, the greater its ranking power. Here is what the transformation looks like in practice:

Before
1
AI Overview allegation summary
No outcome shown
2
Physician named in malpractice filing
Allegation only
3
Court docket outcome not shown
Unresolved
4
Third-party commentary on lawsuit
Allegation only
After Record of Truth
1
AI Overview now references the outcome
Outcome included
2
Record of Truth defense verdict documented
Verified outcome
3
Record of Truth full case timeline
Verified documentation
4
Original article now at position 4
Still indexed

The Record of Truth is published under your name as a factual account of the legal proceedings - not as marketing material from you or from FamoRenovo. Patients encounter it as a structured documentation of what the court found. It does what the legal process cannot: ensure the outcome is as visible as the allegation.

01

Your malpractice defense attorney

Your attorney secured the verdict - and that is invaluable. But their engagement concludes when the court delivers its ruling. Attorneys file documents in PACER and court systems, not in search engine indexes. No law firm has the search engineering capability to make a court ruling compete with years of entrenched news coverage.

02

Your malpractice insurer

Your insurer covered the cost of defense and the claim is now closed. But the reputational damage that persists in search results - lost patients, credentialing questions, referral hesitation - is not covered by any insurance policy. No insurer has a process for ensuring a favourable outcome is visible to the public.

03

Courts, medical boards and the NPDB

The NPDB only tracks claims where a payment was made. If your case was dismissed with no payment, it may not appear in the NPDB at all. State medical boards publish licence status but not case outcomes. None of these institutions ensure that a doctor found not liable has a reputation that reflects it.

04

Reputation management firms

Online reputation management for physicians focuses on patient reviews, social profiles and general positive content. None of this addresses entrenched malpractice lawsuit coverage in search results. Soliciting five-star reviews does not displace a news article about a lawsuit. That requires a different discipline entirely.

We do not operate from a fixed price list. The investment for a Record of Truth is determined by the specific characteristics of each case, assessed transparently before any commitment is made. We are happy to discuss indicative figures once we understand the specifics of your situation.

What determines your investment

Volume and authority of existing negative search results
Geographic scope - local, state-wide or national coverage
Complexity of the case and supporting documentation
Competitiveness of the search landscape around your name
Age and entrenchment of existing negative publications

Payment structure

To commission 50% of agreed investment
On publication Remaining 50%
Annual maintenance 12% of build cost per year
Lifetime maintenance 45% of build cost - once
Common Questions

Questions doctors ask about malpractice lawsuits and Google

A Record of Truth presents the complete legal picture - including the nature of the original allegations, the proceedings, and precisely what the outcome document says. It does not overstate the significance of the result. If a case was dismissed on procedural grounds, the Record will reflect that accurately. If allegations were withdrawn rather than contested and defeated, the Record will say so.

The documentation determines the narrative, not the other way around. Nothing is included that the legal evidence does not directly support. The goal is not to replace one incomplete account with another - it is to ensure that a complete account exists and is visible alongside the original coverage.

Search engines rank content based on authority, engagement and freshness not legal accuracy. When a malpractice lawsuit is filed, multiple outlets report simultaneously, generating links and accumulated authority over months or years. When the case is dismissed, the outcome receives a fraction of that coverage often none at all. Court decisions are filed in legal databases like PACER, not in formats that search engines can index. A Record of Truth corrects this by creating an authoritative publication of the outcome that ranks alongside the negative coverage.

Research consistently shows that it can. 84% of patients research doctors online before booking, and 75% only consider physicians with ratings above four stars. When a patient searches your name and finds malpractice coverage without any mention of the dismissal, the damage is done before they ever contact your office. Negative results also influence referral patterns among colleagues and can affect hospital credentialing and insurance panel decisions.

Initial indexing typically occurs within days to weeks of publication. In one engagement, a Record of Truth reached position one on Google within 23 days, ranking above coverage entrenched for years. Competitive first-page ranking against high-authority negative coverage typically takes three to six months. Timescales vary depending on the authority of existing coverage and the competitiveness of your name in search.

The Record of Truth is published under your name as a factual, structured record of the legal proceedings and their outcome - not as marketing material from you or from FamoRenovo. The commissioning of the Record is not disclosed in the publication itself, because the subject of the document is the case outcome, not your relationship with FamoRenovo. Patients encounter it as a documented account of what the court found.

All case information and correspondence is handled with strict confidentiality. We do not publish client names, share case details with third parties, or reference our engagements publicly.

Indefinitely. High-authority news articles do not expire from search results. A news article from seven, ten or fifteen years ago will continue to rank if no competing content of equal or greater authority exists. Without intervention, the original coverage will remain the dominant narrative permanently. This is why early action matters the longer negative articles accumulate authority unchallenged, the harder they become to displace.

Yes. A Record of Truth is a factual publication built exclusively from verified legal documentation court orders, dismissal letters, defense verdict records and regulatory findings. It makes no claims beyond what the evidence supports and does not alter, suppress or remove existing content. It is a legitimate form of search-optimised publication, no different in principle from any other document produced to inform the public record.

The NPDB only tracks claims where a payment was made on a practitioner's behalf. If your case was dismissed with no payment, it may not appear in the NPDB at all. But this does not help with Google. News articles, court record aggregators and legal databases that published information about the original filing remain indexed and visible to anyone searching your name. The NPDB tells part of the story to a professional audience. Google tells a different story to everyone else.

Ready to see what patients find when they search your name?

Check Your Name Now
Your Investment

Transparent, considered pricing

Every case is different. Our pricing reflects the genuine scope of work required - and nothing more.

We do not operate from a fixed price list. The investment for a Record of Truth is determined by the specific characteristics of your case: The volume and authority of existing coverage, the number of malpractice-related publications involved, the complexity of the legal narrative, and whether coverage is local, state-wide or national.

Each factor is assessed openly, so you understand precisely what drives the investment before any commitment is made. A fixed-price proposal is generated at the end of the commissioning process - not as an estimate, but as a guaranteed figure.

For most physicians, the total investment reflects the depth of research, clinical and legal documentation work, and the sustained technical optimisation required to achieve lasting search visibility for the outcome.

What determines your investment

Volume and authority of existing malpractice-related search results
Geographic scope - local, state-wide or national coverage
Complexity of the malpractice case and supporting documentation
Competitiveness of the search landscape around your name and specialty
Age and entrenchment of existing negative publications

Payment structure

To commission 50% of agreed investment
On publication Remaining 50%

How to get your price

Start with the eligibility check - it costs nothing, takes 30 seconds, and gives you an accurate picture of what patients currently see when they search your name.

Check eligibility
Monitoring and Maintenance

Included until page one. Then your choice.

Included as standard: Monitoring until page one

From the day your Record of Truth is published, FamoRenovo monitors its search ranking continuously and issues a formal written report each month. This is included in your build cost, at no additional charge. If your Record has not reached page one of Google within 90 days of publication, we continue working - at no further cost to you - until it does. The page one position is the baseline. What happens after that is your decision.

No maintenance
No additional cost

Your Record of Truth will hold its page one position for as long as its authority exceeds that of any competing content. For many cases - particularly those with limited existing coverage or a low-competition search landscape - this can be a considerable period without any intervention at all.

There is no obligation, no subscription and no further fee. Your Record is yours. What it cannot offer is active defence: if the landscape shifts, the position may slip, and recovering it will cost more than protecting it would have.

  • Page one achieved and verified
  • Monthly reports for first 3 months
  • Ongoing monthly ranking reports
  • Proactive optimisation
  • Reactive intervention if threatened

Suitable for low-competition search landscapes.

Annual Maintenance
15% of the standard build cost per year

Your page one position is actively monitored and defended throughout the year. As search algorithms evolve and the competitive landscape shifts, FamoRenovo makes proactive adjustments to sustain your Record's authority. If a competing publication gains ground, we respond before the position is lost.

Invoiced annually. Renew or cancel at each anniversary - there is no long-term commitment. The subscription activates only once your Record has reached page one.

  • Page one achieved and verified
  • Monthly ranking reports - ongoing
  • Proactive optimisation throughout
  • Reactive intervention if threatened
  • Permanent - renewal required annually

Renewable annually. No long-term lock-in.

Best value
Lifetime Maintenance
45% of the standard build cost - once

Everything in the annual subscription, permanently. One payment. No renewal decisions. No recurring fees. Your Record of Truth is monitored, optimised and defended for as long as it exists - with the full benefit of that protection holding indefinitely.

The outcome your case produced will continue to be the first thing found, for life - actively protected against anything that might seek to displace it.

  • Page one achieved and verified
  • Monthly ranking reports - permanent
  • Proactive optimisation - permanent
  • Reactive intervention - permanent
  • No recurring fees, ever

One payment. Protected for life.

The cost of not deciding

Search rankings do not stay still. A Record of Truth that achieves page one does so by outperforming every competing piece of content on relevance, authority and evidentiary quality. Those signals need periodic attention as algorithms evolve. A Record without maintenance will hold its position until something displaces it. When that happens, recovery is more intensive and more expensive than protection would have been - and in some cases requires a second or third Record to restore the authority the original achieved. The choice between the three options above is made once. The consequences of that choice run for as long as the Record exists.

Find Your Situation